there is nothing intuitive about the workings of the game:
If the game stood alone and you didn't write a description, I would have to figure out what kills me. Add some instructions that visually tell you (show the sprite in the instructions rather than a description) what harms you, maybe how things harm you (the crowd moves you back). Be sure though not to overwhelm the player with instructions, make it as small and concise as possible

bugs: going through walls from underneath
you can get pickpocketed to the point of being in debt
you will often get stopped by the side of a building

The game design is surprisingly not bad. There are moments where i think about the risk and the rewards of my actions, which are made from the elements in the game. The very middle of the road is the safest part of the street (which could be a good quirk of the level even if it might be an oversight), but I'm not able to stay there the entire time because I slow down if I don't get to a bathroom. the pee mechanic is fairly well implemented, as it forces the player into taking risks .

The game seemed unfair at first, but the game allowed me to think around my previous problems. I think the biggest unfair element might be those instances of getting stuck between the the risk of crossing the road and the girl and guy that will instantly game over you.

The scoring of the game is completely abstract from the player. What gives me more score? What's the point of scoring? Is score only dependent on time? There is no indication of this, and we need some clarification if you want people to really try getting more score.

buying anything is useless at this state. For food, there is no incentive for a player to buy food accept for the possibility that it might make them faster. buying food has the huge possible detriment of slowing you down to a pixel per second. The risk is rarely considered because recovering from being sick is painfully slow and too difficult. This makes buying any food pointless. The only other thing you can buy is transportation, which doesn't add much to the game as it just skips the level. You should make buying things more interesting and rewarding, rather than pointless and too risky.

The art and audio clash. The audio in the title screen has real voices: real things compliment other real things. the art it pixelated and retro: retro things compliment other retro aspects. The art and the audio have different qualities that don't match up when put together. This is bad as it is a break in unity. A break in unity can be jarring and sometimes humorous, but is a show of a lack of understanding how certain things fit with each other. you should find the biggest represented aspect in your game (I would say retro feeling) and make everything fit into that feeling well. A break in unity can sometimes be used to contrast two things, or to make some point. In your case the game breaks its unity because you wanted the player feel like their in some bar or cafe or something before they start the game. I think it's not too terrible in your case but if it's reoccurring it could pile up and get real bad real quick.

Overall I don't think this game is too great, it has only a few good things, like its interesting and possibly unintended risk-reward considerations. The concept and execution isn't crazy innovative. The art is bad and clashes with the audio.

You want to improve this game and make it better, but the rating that you get is going to be based mostly on this first version. I think you need to get out of the habit of "I'll fix the bad things later," and you should try showing us the extents of what you can make when you first release your work. Personally I don't care whether or not you choose to leave in flaws in your games, but if you leave in flaws you won't be able to get feedback on aspects of your game that people would have commented on if it were fully developed. Most feedback is going to come from the first time you published, not later with the improvements. The most important feedback you can get on your work is when you think you can't make the game any better than it is right now. Don't get in the mindset of trying to only improve your work, try to improve yourself and your understanding of your work as well.

-Sorry for being an internet jackass, Sincerely Pizza Roll

Here's just a "few" of my problems

-audio
1 the mute button in the menu doesn't work
2 it only silences the current loop so, when it replays the loop, the music comes back aka not muted
3 pressing the unmute button, simply adds a layer of music on top of the loop.
4 in the "instructions" menu, the music goes silent once the loop is done
5 pressing either of the audio buttons doesn't matter because the music resets when starting the game (making #3 less of a problem)
6 the sounds are LOUD and i don't really care about the music

-Visuals
1 The game is ugly
2 the "instruction's" text is tiny
3 the animations are bad
4 the colors contrast, but don't make sense

-Game Design
1 the level design is boring - shooting zombies in a straight line isn't very fun (imo)
2 a side-scroller shooter game isn't anything new
3 the player is over powered
4 the tank is more over powered

-Miscellaneous
1 the game is very buggy - getting stuck in walls - the "e" tank situation
2 Im a bit salty seeing that "This Flash has reached protected status."
3 just because this is your first game (im assuming from your newgrounds profile) doesn't mean that it should be given any pitty points, all flash games deserve equal respect (imo)

-summary
I don't like your game, it's boring, ugly, and sounds bad.

i hope for you to make better games in the future with a little more effort put into them.

Good luck, and have a nice day,

-sincerely some jackass over the internet